Standard Insurance Company's attempt to dismiss disability insurance lawsuit is denied in-part by Florida Federal Judge
Disability claimant challenges Standard Insurance Company’s attempt to limit disability benefits to 24 months under the “Other Limited Conditions” provision.
Very often, disability insurance companies are being sued due to wrongful denial of claims or wrongful termination of disability benefits. There are occasions where a court will dismiss a disability claimant’s lawsuit if it is premature or not ripe. Insurance companies will routinely file motions to dismiss in an effort to either delay a decision on the merits or to win the case without the court considering the merits. Motions to dismiss are rarely granted. For motions to dismiss, the courts have to view the complaint in a manner that is most favorable to the plaintiff.
The federal rules governing civil proceedings don’t require a detailed plea from the plaintiff to base his or her claim on. Only a short statement as to the plea is needed to give the opposing party a fair notice of what the claim is and the ground upon which it rests. Nevertheless, the plaintiff is still required to allege “more than labels and conclusions”¦” and raises “”¦ [the plaintiff’s] right to relief above the speculative level.” The case of Brain S. Hayse vs. Standard Insurance Company is a good example of how the Courts implement the above mentioned rule.
The Background Of The Case Against Standard Insurance Filed by Disability Attorney
The plaintiff in this case enrolled in a long term disability policy that was issued by the Standard Insurance Company (Standard Co). On November 2008, after suffering a disabling injury, the plaintiff was awarded long term disability benefits by Standard Co. On October 27th 2010, Standard Insurance informed the plaintiff that his disability benefits would end on September 27th 2011 as they were limited to 24 months. The plaintiff then, filed a lawsuit against Standard Co claiming an anticipatory breach of contract and Declaratory Relief. In response, Standard Insurance filed a motion to dismiss both claims made by the plaintiff.
The District Court Rulings
The District Court in its ruling granted Standard Insurance the motion to dismiss the anticipatory breach of contract claim and denied the motion to dismiss Declaratory Relief for the following reasons below:
Claim of Anticipatory Breach of Contract is Dismissed by Court as it is not Ripe
The District Court ruled that the plaintiff is still receiving disability benefits from Standard Co until September 27th 2011 if the plaintiff remains disabled. Standard Co did not indicate that it wanted to repudiate the plaintiff’s policy but rather recognized that the plaintiff could become disabled due to a different condition in the plaintiff’s policy. In other words, the plaintiff has not shown that he had suffered damages due to Standard’s notification of the expiry of his benefits. Hence, the plaintiff’s claim for the anticipatory breach of contract must be dismissed.
Claim for Declaratory Relief Is not Dismissed and the Case will Continue Against Standard Insurance Company
The plaintiff’s other claim revolves around the issue as to whether he is subjected to the “Other Limited Conditions” classification contained in the Plan. Standard Co asserted that there is no actual present need for a declaration of the plaintiff’s future rights to benefits. The court recognized that Declaratory Judgments are “a valuable procedure for the resolution of insurance coverage dispute to the benefits of insurers, insured and claimants.”
The District Court ruled that before any claim for Declaratory Relief be entertained; it must be clearly shown that there is an actual need for the Declaratory Relief. In this case, the Plaintiff alleged that he is not subject to the “Other Limited Conditions” classification within the policy. And because Standard Co has already classified Plaintiff’s disability under the policy and the plaintiff disputed this classification, there is an actual, present controversy between the parties. The court ruled that resolving this dispute will determine the rights of both parties under the policy. As such, the Plaintiff is entitled to a declaratory judgment regarding his long term disability rights.
This case will continue and the court will eventually make a ruling on the declaratory judgment. Standard insurance company is represented by an experienced and well skilled defense attorney that our law firm has faced on numerous occasions.
Resources to Help You Win Disability Benefits
Submit a Strong Standard Appeal Package
We work with you, your doctors, and other experts to submit a very strong Standard appeal.
Sue Standard
We have filed thousands of disability denial lawsuits in federal Courts nationwide against Standard.
Get Your Standard Disability Application Approved
Prevent a Standard Disability Benefit Denial
Negotiate a Standard Lump-Sum Settlement
Our goal is to negotiate the highest possible buyout of your long-term disability policy.
Policy Holder Rating
Standard insurance just dropped me with no communication with me.
Reply
Standard is one of, if not the worse, company in the industry now
Standard is one of, if not the worse, company in the industry Standard hasn't approved or denied my claim in over a year. They keep promising to look at it 'next week'
Reply
I waited 5 weeks just to be told I can't receive benefits
Reply
The Standard will threaten to withhold your pay until you sign every document that they send you. The worst part is when they consider back payment for SSDI benefits
Standard's sudden denial was inexplicable
Standard has keep me jumping through hoops for years
Reply
Mental health LTD should be covered under the Mental Health Parity Act
Q: Do I have to pay back LTD after receiving SSDI?
Q: Non-taxable benefits have become taxable.
Q: How do I ensure Standard makes a timely decision with regard to my claim?
Q: Why can my employer hold my disability check after The Standard sends it to them? Can I file a grievance with them?
Q: Should I contact you before submitting my application for a private disability benefit?
Q: Is there any case law in which a state government employee LTD plan decided to drop the 24 month mental health limitation? Has there been any success against a state government and Standard using ADA Title I (employee) and 3 (insurance company) from a discrimination basis?
Q: How can Standard deny my claim and expect me to work when I am disabled?
Q: I'm waiting to hear back about my appeal. Should I hire an attorney?
Applying for Standard Disability Benefits? Top 5 Claim Denial Reasons
How to Prevent Standard Insurance Company from Denying Disability Benefits
Can My Insurance Company Terminate My Disability Benefits After 24 Months if My Mental Nervous Disorder Contributes to But is Not The Sole Cause of My Disability?
Dentist and doctors: beware of the Standard Insurance Company Group's long-term disability policy
Why Must Your Disability Insurance Lawyer Understand Your Disabling Condition?
Disability Benefit Denial Reason #5 – Your Medical Evidence is Weak
Disability Benefit Denial Reason #4 - Your Doctor Is Misled By the Disability Company
Disability Benefit Denial Reason #3 - Video & Social Media Surveillance
Seven Surgeries and The Standard Still Denies Disability Insurance Benefits
After Two Appeals The Standard Insurance Approves Short & Long Term Disability Benefits for Nurse
Standard Approves Disability Benefits to Attorney with Fibromyalgia
Standard overturns decision to deny disabled Project Manager long-term disability insurance benefits after first Appeal
Another long term disability claim is reinstated after Disability Attorney Alexander Palamara successfully argues The Standard mishandled preexisting condition investigation
Standard Overturns Denial of Benefits to Shareholder of Major Law Firm
Disability Attorney Alex Palamara wins LTD Benefits for Police Officer Denied by Standard
Standard Overturns Denial of Disability Insurance Benefits
Reviews from Our Clients






