Oregon Court Orders Standard to Pay Plaintiff Prejudgment Interest
The current case of Robertson v. Standard Life Insurance Company concerns the proper calculation of prejudgment interest based on the court’s previous ruling that Standard had abused its discretion in terminating plaintiff’s long term disability benefits. The original order was based on Standard’s denial of benefits under the “own occupation” definition of disability under its policy. To date, Standard has made no decision on whether the plaintiff is disabled from working at “any occupation.” The court ordered “retroactive reinstatement of Plaintiff’s Own Occupation benefits from the time they were terminated to the time that they would have expired.” It remanded to Standard to consider her claim that she was disabled from “any occupation.”
Original Order Reinstating Benefits
In the earlier substantive case, the court found in favor of the plaintiff, a cytogenetic technologist, who suffered from chronic neck and back pain despite multiple medical treatments and surgical intervention. The court found numerous flaws in Standard’s reasoning for its denial and, instead of remanding, ordered benefits to be reinstated. The court also ordered the plaintiff to “prepare an appropriate Judgment consistent with this Opinion and, after conferring with Defendant, shall submit it to the Court for signature…”. The parties disagreed on how the judgment should be worded which led to the court subsequently clarifying its original order.
District Court Clarification of Original Order
The plaintiff interpreted the court’s original order as reinstating her benefits under any definition of disability. Standard argued that it had not determined whether or not she was disabled from “any occupation” and the only issue in the previous case had been her disability from working at her “own occupation.” The court agreed with Standard. Relying on Ninth Circuit precedent, the Oregon court noted that “when a plan administrator abuses its discretion by terminating disability benefits under a specific disability standard, the reviewing court may only reinstate those benefits under the same standard.”
In fashioning its order for prejudgment interest, the court reiterated its original opinion that Standard “fell far short in fulfilling its fiduciary duty to plaintiff” and acted in “bad faith.” The court ordered prejudgment interest for the appropriate length of time according to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1961 which is based on the current T-Bill rate. The court also commented that, “Plaintiff may seek her attorney’s fees and costs in accordance with the Federal Rules and Local Rules of Civil Procedure.” It remanded the case to Standard for administrative determination of plaintiff’s claim that she was disabled from “Any Occupation.”
This case was not handled by our office, but it may provide claimants guidance in the calculation of prejudgment interest when ordered by a court. If you need assistance with a similar matter, or have any questions concerning a disability claim, please contact any of our lawyers for a free consultation.
Resources to Help You Win Disability Benefits
Submit a Strong Standard Appeal Package
We work with you, your doctors, and other experts to submit a very strong Standard appeal.
Sue Standard
We have filed thousands of disability denial lawsuits in federal Courts nationwide against Standard.
Get Your Standard Disability Application Approved
Prevent a Standard Disability Benefit Denial
Negotiate a Standard Lump-Sum Settlement
Our goal is to negotiate the highest possible buyout of your long-term disability policy.
Policy Holder Rating
Standard insurance just dropped me with no communication with me.
Reply
Standard is one of, if not the worse, company in the industry now
Standard is one of, if not the worse, company in the industry Standard hasn't approved or denied my claim in over a year. They keep promising to look at it 'next week'
Reply
I waited 5 weeks just to be told I can't receive benefits
Reply
The Standard will threaten to withhold your pay until you sign every document that they send you. The worst part is when they consider back payment for SSDI benefits
Standard's sudden denial was inexplicable
Standard has keep me jumping through hoops for years
Reply
Mental health LTD should be covered under the Mental Health Parity Act
Q: Do I have to pay back LTD after receiving SSDI?
Q: Non-taxable benefits have become taxable.
Q: How do I ensure Standard makes a timely decision with regard to my claim?
Q: Why can my employer hold my disability check after The Standard sends it to them? Can I file a grievance with them?
Q: Should I contact you before submitting my application for a private disability benefit?
Q: Is there any case law in which a state government employee LTD plan decided to drop the 24 month mental health limitation? Has there been any success against a state government and Standard using ADA Title I (employee) and 3 (insurance company) from a discrimination basis?
Q: How can Standard deny my claim and expect me to work when I am disabled?
Q: I'm waiting to hear back about my appeal. Should I hire an attorney?
Applying for Standard Disability Benefits? Top 5 Claim Denial Reasons
How to Prevent Standard Insurance Company from Denying Disability Benefits
Can My Insurance Company Terminate My Disability Benefits After 24 Months if My Mental Nervous Disorder Contributes to But is Not The Sole Cause of My Disability?
Dentist and doctors: beware of the Standard Insurance Company Group's long-term disability policy
Why Must Your Disability Insurance Lawyer Understand Your Disabling Condition?
Disability Benefit Denial Reason #5 – Your Medical Evidence is Weak
Disability Benefit Denial Reason #4 - Your Doctor Is Misled By the Disability Company
Disability Benefit Denial Reason #3 - Video & Social Media Surveillance
Seven Surgeries and The Standard Still Denies Disability Insurance Benefits
After Two Appeals The Standard Insurance Approves Short & Long Term Disability Benefits for Nurse
Standard Approves Disability Benefits to Attorney with Fibromyalgia
Standard overturns decision to deny disabled Project Manager long-term disability insurance benefits after first Appeal
Another long term disability claim is reinstated after Disability Attorney Alexander Palamara successfully argues The Standard mishandled preexisting condition investigation
Standard Overturns Denial of Benefits to Shareholder of Major Law Firm
Disability Attorney Alex Palamara wins LTD Benefits for Police Officer Denied by Standard
Standard Overturns Denial of Disability Insurance Benefits
Reviews from Our Clients






