Principal Life denies disability benefits to a physician and then seeks attorney fees after physician's disability denial is affirmed by Texas Judge
Dr. Bruce Leipzig had been denied long-term disability benefits by Principal Life Insurance Company, and brought his ERISA case before the District Court covering the northern part of Texas. After hearing the case, the Court issued summary judgment in favor of the disability insurance company.
The District Court, however, refused to consider Principal Life’s request for attorney’s fees, even though the physician’s Texas disability insurance attorney and Principal Life had agreed that the issue of attorney’s fees should be addressed post-judgment. It is rare that a disability insurance company will pursue attorney fees from a claimant but is a factor that any disability claimant filing a disability insurance lawsuit must be aware of. The award of attorney fees is always discretionary with the judge in ERISA disability cases.
Principal Life’s Appeal of the District Court decision was heard in New Orleans before the Fifth Circuit which hears appeals out of Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas. The issue before the Appellate Court was whether the District Court was correct to refuse to consider Principal Life insurance company’s request for attorney’s fees because they had not presented a formal request for attorney’s fees before the Texas District Court had issued summary judgment in the disability insurance plan’s favor.
Leipzig had been a surgeon at the time he became disabled. He complained of double vision which made it impossible for him to continue as a surgeon. After the elimination period ended, Principal Life paid benefits for two years under an “Own Occupation” definition of disability. When the two years expired, Principal Life reviewed whether he was disabled from “Any Occupation.”
Despite the fact that he still had vision problems and could not perform surgery, Principal Life found that he was capable of seeing patients five days a week and capable of making 66-2/3% of his pre-disability earnings as a consulting physician. The physician argued that he was unable to earn this in Brownwood, Texas where he lived because there wasn’t an adequate patient base to support a practice that did not provide surgery. Principal Life responded that lack of patients was not an ongoing disability.
The physician’s disability insurance lawyer represented his claim in court. Neither side disputed that he could no longer perform surgery. The dispute arose from Principal Life’s interpretation of the definition of “disability.” Would the Court agree with Principal Life’s interpretation that a disability only existed if the claimant was unable to work in any occupation for which his training and experience prepared him for? Or would the Court consider the physician’s argument that the disability insurance company had to consider the patient base of the physician’s home community in Brownwood, Texas?
The Court had to determine whether Principal Life had interpreted the Plan in a way that was legally correct and fair. Had Principal Life interpreted the plan in its “ordinary and popular sense as would a person of average intelligence and experience?”
The Court found that yes, Principal Life had interpreted the Plan language fairly. The Court found that the Plan made it clear that sickness or injury had to be the cause of a claimant’s inability to earn 66-2/3% of post-disability earnings in the “Any Occupation” phase of the Plan. The lack of sufficient patients in Leipzig’s home town was not a sickness or injury. Economic factors were not covered by the definition in the Plan.
Because the disability insurance plan granted discretion to Principal Life to interpret the Plan, the Court could not consider whether or not the doctor’s interpretation of the Plan language was a better one or not. The Court found that Principal Life’s reading was reasonable.
Principal Life then asked the Court to grant attorney’s fees. The District Court denied the request because Principal Life had not submitted the materials ERISA requires in order for the Court to consider such a request. Principal Life pointed to the prior agreement between it and Leipzig to address this matter after the Court had reached its decision. The District Court reasoned that it “was not bound by the parties’ agreement.”
The District Court’s decision was in contradiction to Rule 54(d)(2)(B) which states, “Unless a statute or a court order provides otherwise, the motion [for attorney’s fees] must: (i) be filed no later than 14 days after the entry of judgment… ” The motion must “specify the judgment… entitling the movant to the award.” A plain reading of this rule suggests that an attorney’s fee motion would usually be filed after the Court enters its judgment. Otherwise how could the judgment be specified?
When Principal Life failed to file a post-judgment motion for fees, the District Court pointed to this as evidence that that its decision was appropriate. The Court of Appeals disagreed. The Court of Appeals reasoned that because Principal Life had been denied the right to attorney’s fees by the Court, why would it then file a motion? The Court of Appeals found the District Court’s decision abused its discretion. The decision to deny attorney’s fees was reversed and remanded to the District Court for the necessary further proceedings.
Resources to Help You Win Disability Benefits
Submit a Strong Principal Appeal Package
We work with you, your doctors, and other experts to submit a very strong Principal appeal.
Sue Principal
We have filed thousands of disability denial lawsuits in federal Courts nationwide against Principal.
Get Your Principal Disability Application Approved
Prevent a Principal Disability Benefit Denial
Negotiate a Principal Lump-Sum Settlement
Our goal is to negotiate the highest possible buyout of your long-term disability policy.
Policy Holder Rating
Sorry, Principal. My residual and renewal commissions aren't "earned"
Reply
Principal will do anything not to pay
Reply
Principal is absolutely ridiculous. I'm in financial harship after not receibing my full pay from work and exhausting my long term sick
Reply
Principal owes me 60k
Reply
I lost everything when Principal terminated my benefits without calling or emailing me
Reply
I cant but feel I am being starved out and given the runaround.
Reply
Principal owes me 4k
Reply
I've never worked with people that are so obviously stalling before. Bunch of crooks
Reply
Q: Can Principal deduct my social security payment from my monthly Principal disability benefit payment?
Q: Is child support arrears considered an income offset for Principal LTD?
Q: Why did Principal not back me when Social Security did?
Q: What is the difference between time period of the claim while approved and the time period of the claim while denied?
Q: Will Principal harass me if I don't accept their buyout? And, is it standard for a buyout to be lower than the full benefit paid over time?
Q: Can Principal's independent physician determine what I can and cannot do?
Q: Do I have to pay Principal back once I receive back pay from SSA?
Q: Can Principal take away my deceased husband's 3 month survivor benefit? They justified it saying he was eligible for SSDI when he didn't even apply.
Principal Disability Benefit Denial Options
Stephen Jessup and Gregory Dell discuss their experience in handling claims with Principal Financial
Why Must Your Disability Insurance Lawyer Understand Your Disabling Condition?
Disability Benefit Denial Reason #5 – Your Medical Evidence is Weak
Disability Benefit Denial Reason #4 - Your Doctor Is Misled By the Disability Company
Disability Benefit Denial Reason #3 - Video & Social Media Surveillance
How Do You Fight a Long-Term Disability Denial?
Disability Denial Reason #2 - Change of Disability Definition & Vocational Review
After Principal Denies Continued Disability Benefits, Attorney Alexander Palamara Gets Claim Reinstated for a Vienna Beef Employee
Principal reinstates benefits of Orthopedic Surgeon unable to work full-time after Attorney Rachel Alters submits Appeal
Dell Disability Lawyers Successfully Appeals Denial Of Benefits To Claimant With Trigeminal Neuralgia
Administrative Appeal by Dell Disability Lawyers forces Principal to Reinstate ERISA Long Term Disability Claim of Former Healthways, Inc. Employee
Principal Approves Long Term Disability Benefits for Surgeon
Seven Surgeries and The Standard Still Denies Disability Insurance Benefits
Sun Life Wrongfully Denies Disability After Paying For 23 Months
Nurse Denied Long-term Disability Benefits by Lincoln After the Definition of Disability Changed
Reviews from Our Clients






