Federal Court Orders Principal Life Insurance Company to Pay Disability Benefits
In Zorn v. Principal Life Insurance Company, the plaintiff, a member of the National Association of Professional Insurance Agents, obtained insurance provided to the association by Principal Life Insurance Company (PLIC). The policy provided for five years of benefits for those disabled from their own occupation. After that time, the definition of disability changed and insureds were then considered disabled only if they could not perform the tasks of any job “that reasonably fits his or her background and training.”
PLIC made two arguments in its endeavor to prevent Zorn from qualifying for benefits: 1) The ERISA lawsuit was barred by the statute of limitations; and 2) If the lawsuit was not barred, Zorn was still not entitled to benefits. The Georgia court disagreed with PLIC on both issues and ordered it to pay Zorn long term disability benefits.
The Statute of Limitations
The parties agreed there was a three-year statute of limitations according to the insurance contract. The dispute was over the date that the statute began to run. PLIC argued it began to run when it first denied Zorn’s claim in November 2005. Zorn argued the statute was tolled during the pendency of his appeal and therefore, it did not begin to run until August 30, 2007. He filed his lawsuit on November 10, 2009, within the three-year period of time. Therefore, he argued it was timely. The court agreed with Zorn and noted that Eleventh Circuit cases “have determined that limitations periods are tolled until the end of an administrative review process.” The court held that Zorn’s argument was the correct one and, “Thus, the contractual limitation does not bar Zorn’s claim.”
Zorn’s Claim for Benefits
The court carefully analyzed the duties Zorn was required to perform according to his job description and the medical evidence presented to support that he suffered from interstitial cystitis. Interstitial cystitis is also called painful bladder syndrome. The condition makes patients feel like they have to urinate all the time. It is also painful, so they take pain medication that may affect their cognitive functioning.
Despite reports of two treating physicians and one independent medical examiner that Zorn indeed suffered from interstitial cystitis to a degree that he could not work at his job, PLIC relied on one independent medical examiner who opined that Zorn was not disabled. The doctor who gave this report met with Zorn on only one occasion. Additionally, he was not a specialist in Zorn’s illness. According to the court, that doctor’s “lack of expertise in interstitial cystitis makes his opinion even more conspicuous in its solitude as PLIC’s lone expert support.”
In fact, a second independent medical review concluded that Zorn was as disabled as his treating physicians claimed. In addition, the examiner supported the claim that the narcotics, which were his “only source of relief” also made him “incapable of sedentary work.” In addition, two separate employability analyses concluded that Zorn was disabled and could not work at any occupation.
Considering all the medical evidence and occupational analyses, “the Court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that Zorn was disabled within the meaning of the policy. Accordingly, the Court disagrees with and REVERSES the administrative decision.”
This case was not handled by our office, but it may be instructive to those who are dealing with insurers who are trying to dismiss a claim due to a statute of limitations clause or based on the opinion of a sole independent medical examiner. If you have any questions about disability claims, call us. One of our attorneys will provide you a free case evaluation.
Resources to Help You Win Disability Benefits
Submit a Strong Principal Appeal Package
We work with you, your doctors, and other experts to submit a very strong Principal appeal.
Sue Principal
We have filed thousands of disability denial lawsuits in federal Courts nationwide against Principal.
Get Your Principal Disability Application Approved
Prevent a Principal Disability Benefit Denial
Negotiate a Principal Lump-Sum Settlement
Our goal is to negotiate the highest possible buyout of your long-term disability policy.
Policy Holder Rating
Sorry, Principal. My residual and renewal commissions aren't "earned"
Reply
Principal will do anything not to pay
Reply
Principal is absolutely ridiculous. I'm in financial harship after not receibing my full pay from work and exhausting my long term sick
Reply
Principal owes me 60k
Reply
I lost everything when Principal terminated my benefits without calling or emailing me
Reply
I cant but feel I am being starved out and given the runaround.
Reply
Principal owes me 4k
Reply
I've never worked with people that are so obviously stalling before. Bunch of crooks
Reply
Q: Can Principal deduct my social security payment from my monthly Principal disability benefit payment?
Q: Is child support arrears considered an income offset for Principal LTD?
Q: Why did Principal not back me when Social Security did?
Q: What is the difference between time period of the claim while approved and the time period of the claim while denied?
Q: Will Principal harass me if I don't accept their buyout? And, is it standard for a buyout to be lower than the full benefit paid over time?
Q: Can Principal's independent physician determine what I can and cannot do?
Q: Do I have to pay Principal back once I receive back pay from SSA?
Q: Can Principal take away my deceased husband's 3 month survivor benefit? They justified it saying he was eligible for SSDI when he didn't even apply.
Principal Disability Benefit Denial Options
Stephen Jessup and Gregory Dell discuss their experience in handling claims with Principal Financial
Why Must Your Disability Insurance Lawyer Understand Your Disabling Condition?
Disability Benefit Denial Reason #5 – Your Medical Evidence is Weak
Disability Benefit Denial Reason #4 - Your Doctor Is Misled By the Disability Company
Disability Benefit Denial Reason #3 - Video & Social Media Surveillance
How Do You Fight a Long-Term Disability Denial?
Disability Denial Reason #2 - Change of Disability Definition & Vocational Review
After Principal Denies Continued Disability Benefits, Attorney Alexander Palamara Gets Claim Reinstated for a Vienna Beef Employee
Principal reinstates benefits of Orthopedic Surgeon unable to work full-time after Attorney Rachel Alters submits Appeal
Dell Disability Lawyers Successfully Appeals Denial Of Benefits To Claimant With Trigeminal Neuralgia
Administrative Appeal by Dell Disability Lawyers forces Principal to Reinstate ERISA Long Term Disability Claim of Former Healthways, Inc. Employee
Principal Approves Long Term Disability Benefits for Surgeon
Seven Surgeries and The Standard Still Denies Disability Insurance Benefits
Sun Life Wrongfully Denies Disability After Paying For 23 Months
Nurse Denied Long-term Disability Benefits by Lincoln After the Definition of Disability Changed
Reviews from Our Clients






