9th Circuit Clarifies The Definition Of "Sedentary Work"
In Armani v. Northwest Mutual, plaintiff Avery Armani, a Controller for an insurance agency, injured his back while lifting a heavy back-up power supply at work. As an employee of the insurance agency, he was covered by a Group Long-Term Disability Insurance policy issued by Northwest Mutual (NWM).
Benefit Provisions
Under the terms of the LTD Policy, the definition of disability changed after benefits were paid for 24 months. For the first 24 months, a claimant must be “unable to perform with reasonable continuity the material duties of his Own Occupation.” After 24 months of disability, the claimant must be “unable to perform with reasonable continuity the material duties of Any Gainful Occupation for which he is reasonably fitted by education, training, and experience”.
Initial Claim Approval and Subsequent Denial
Armani submitted his claim for benefits in July 2011. He was limited to sitting for four hours, standing for two hours, and walking for two hours during an eight-hour workday. NWM’s vocational case manager confirmed that Armani’s occupation was classified as sedentary, and Armani’s disability claim was approved under the “own occupation” definition test effective July 18, 2011.
Between September 2011 and January 2012, Armani continued to visit chiropractors, pain specialists, and physicians, all of whom confirmed that Armani’s disability precluded him from working. Based solely on these medical records, however, NWM’s reviewing physician determined that Armani was capable of working in a sedentary position. In July 2013 NWM informed Armani that his LTD claim was being closed because “his records did not support a disability under the ‘own occupation’ or ‘any occupation” test.’
Armani’s Appeal of the Denial of Continued Benefits
After NWM denied his claim for continuing benefits, Armani appealed the decision and requested a review by a second doctor. NWM submitted the file to a second doctor who concluded that Armani was not precluded from sedentary work and that “[i]t would be reasonable that [Armani] would have the ability to reposition from sitting to standing occasionally as needed.” NWM upheld the denial. Having exhausted his administrative remedies, Armani filed this ERISA lawsuit.
The District Court’s Case
In the District Court Armani argued that he was “unable to perform any occupation classified as ‘sedentary,’ because, by definition, ‘sedentary’ requires an ability to sit for six hours.” The court held that NWM was not bound by this definition of “sedentary” work on the basis that it was drawn from the Social Security context. Citing “the vast differences in both form and function between Social Security law and ERISA law,” the district court concluded, without further discussion or analysis, that “the federal criteria for Social Security claims are not transferable to ERISA cases.” The 9th Circuit, however, determined this conclusion was erroneous.
The 9th Circuit’s Holding
The 9th Circuit found that the administrative record available to the district court plainly showed that, between July 25, 2011, and April 15, 2013, every physician and chiropractor who treated Armani determined that he could not sit for more than four hours a day.
The 9th Circuit concluded that an employee who cannot sit for more than four hours in an eight-hour workday cannot perform work classified as “sedentary.” The Court further noted that “sedentary work” generally requires the ability to sit for at least six hours. Thus the logical conclusion is that an employee who is unable to sit for more than half of the workday cannot consistently perform an occupation that requires sitting for “most of the time.” Based on these findings, the Court held that an employee who cannot sit for more than four hours in an eight-hour workday cannot perform “sedentary” work that requires “sitting most of the time.”
This case was not handled by our office, but it may provide claimants guidance in their pursuit of compensation under the accidental dismemberment clause of an insurance policy. If you need assistance with a similar matter please contact any of our lawyers for a free consultation.
Resources to Help You Win Disability Benefits
Submit a Strong Northwestern Mutual Appeal Package
We work with you, your doctors, and other experts to submit a very strong Northwestern Mutual appeal.
Sue Northwestern Mutual
We have filed thousands of disability denial lawsuits in federal Courts nationwide against Northwestern Mutual.
Get Your Northwestern Mutual Disability Application Approved
Prevent a Northwestern Mutual Disability Benefit Denial
Negotiate a Northwestern Mutual Lump-Sum Settlement
Our goal is to negotiate the highest possible buyout of your long-term disability policy.
Policy Holder Rating
Uses every dirty trick in the book
Northwestern thinks I can walk even though my left leg is paralyzed
Northwestern is the Quiet Company that silently screws its policy holders but is too big to fail
My claim was handled so unprofessionally – almost no written communication from NW Mutual
Reply
NWM refused to have a hematologist review my claim since my "numbers are currently normal." They ignored my primary concern of relapsing
Reply
NW said my relatives' claim was "not justified" and double the premium for no reason
BAD FAITH
Reply
NML says I have no limitarion and is refusing my benefits
Reply
Q: I have tinnitus which has disabled me. And led to depression. They approved depression for 24 months. That time is coming to an end. My tinnitus prevents me from doing my primary job. How do I appeal?
Q: Do you help with negotiating lump sum settlements of policies?
Q: Are there successful arguments to appeal Northwestern Mutual’s offset of claimant’s LTB by the amount of SSD benefits awarded?
Q: Why does Northwestern ask the questions they do in the "Request for Continuation of Disability Benefits" form?
Q: What exactly does Northwestern mean by “not gainfully employed in any occupation”?
Q: Why is NWM reviewing my claim when my condition hasn't changed? Is it strange that they requested an in-person review?
Q: Can I refuse to sign NWM's authoritization form?
Q: Can NWM rescind my policy because I forgot to disclose an illness I had 20 years ago (that I no longer have)? Do I have to sign their release to access everything about me?
Application Tips: Northwestern Mutual Disability Benefits - Top Denial Reasons
Tips to Protect Your Northwestern Mutual Long Term Disability Benefits
What Can I Expect When Seeking Long Term Disability Benefits from Northwestern Mutual?
Why Must Your Disability Insurance Lawyer Understand Your Disabling Condition?
Disability Benefit Denial Reason #5 – Your Medical Evidence is Weak
Disability Benefit Denial Reason #4 - Your Doctor Is Misled By the Disability Company
Disability Benefit Denial Reason #3 - Video & Social Media Surveillance
How Do You Fight a Long-Term Disability Denial?
Northwestern Mutual Approves Claim For Disability Benefits
After appeal filed by Attorney Jay Symonds, NWM overturned its previous denial of long term disability benefits for California Customer Relations Supervisor
Northwestern Mutual Reinstates Disability Benefits to Attorney Suffering From Gastrointestinal Problems
Northwestern Mutual Approves Long Term Disability Insurance Benefits for Veterinarian
Seven Surgeries and The Standard Still Denies Disability Insurance Benefits
Sun Life Wrongfully Denies Disability After Paying For 23 Months
Nurse Denied Long-term Disability Benefits by Lincoln After the Definition of Disability Changed
Lincoln Reverses Decision to Terminate LTD Benefits of Corporate Attorney after Dell Disability Lawyers Appeals the Decision
Reviews from Our Clients






