New Jersey Federal Court Rules Against Aetna and in Favor of Systems Analyst Disabled by Degenerative Joint Disease of the Lumbar Spine
Before degenerative joint disease of the lumbar spine forced Christopher Patterson to leave his career, Mr. Patterson worked as a Systems Analyst for a consulting firm. Mr. Patterson’s employer provided long-term disability insurance through a plan administered by Aetna Life Insurance Company.
In 2001, Mr. Patterson’s back pain forced him to have lumbar surgery, after which he returned to work full-time and without restrictions. In 2006, his back pain once again returned and forced him to stop working. In early 2007, Mr. Patterson once again underwent yet another lumbar reconstruction surgery. Unfortunately, neither the first nor the second surgery proved to be the solution to Mr. Patterson’s chronic back pain and he was forced to apply for short-term and then long-term disability, which were both approved. Soon after Aetna approved his claims, he applied for social security disability, which the Social Security Administration promptly approved at the application stage and without the need for an administrative hearing.
In 2008, Aetna hired a private investigator to conduct video surveillance of Mr. Patterson. Aetna did not appear concerned with any of the surveillance since they continued paying his claim without interruption. In 2009, Aetna, again decided that it needed to conduct more video surveillance of Mr. Patterson and hired its private investigator to follow and video record Mr. Patterson’s activities over the course of several days.
The surveillance captured Mr. Patterson walking outside of his residence, gathering mail, bending at the waist, putting fluids into his truck, kneeling to check something in his vehicle, driving and twirling his cane as he walked. Four months later, Aetna again conducted more video surveillance which observed Mr. Patterson performing similar activity as the previous rounds of surveillance.
Aetna then sent Mr. Patterson for an “Independent Medical Examination” (IME) with Dr. Salvador Baylen. After reviewing the surveillance video, reviewing the medical history and examining Mr. Patterson, Dr. Baylen determined that Mr. Patterson was capable of performing sedentary work for 40 hours per week. He also opined that “after some degree of conditioning or work hardening, Mr. Patterson [would be] able to perform light duty physical work for 40 hours per week.
Following the video surveillance and IME, Aetna determined that Mr. Patterson remained totally disabled with “no ability to work” and continued approving his claim.
After 7 Years of Long-term Disability Benefits Aetna Terminates Chris Patterson’s Long-term Disability Claim
For the next five years, Aetna continued paying Mr. Patterson’s disability claim, however, again conducted yet more video surveillance in 2013, an internal medical review by a nurse consultant in 2014 and finally a vocational review in late 2014. Following the medical and vocational reviews Aetna decided it was time to terminate Mr. Patterson’s long-term disability and ceased paying benefits.
Following the submission of his mandatory administrative appeal, Aetna requested a second independent medical peer review. The orthopedic surgeon hired by Aetna to conduct the review opined that Mr. Patterson had the functional ability to sit without limitation, and walk for forty-five minutes at a time, but that he should avoid bending, twisting, or crawling, despite never physically examining Mr. Patterson. Following the medical review, Aetna informed Mr. Patterson that its decision to terminate his disability claim would be upheld on the basis that it felt he was capable of performing the material duties of his own occupation as defined in the national economy.
Federal Judge Finds Aetna’s Decision to Terminate Mr. Patterson’s Long-term Disability Claim Arbitrary and Capricious and Overturns Aetna’s Decision.
Following the exhaustion of his administrative appeals, Mr. Patterson filed a lawsuit against Aetna in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey alleging that Aetna had improperly terminated his claim and sought reinstatement of his disability benefits, on-going waiver of his life insurance premiums, interest, court costs and attorney fees.
Following its review of the administrative record and the motions for summary judgment filed by Mr. Patterson and Aetna, the Court found that by not considering the actual duties performed by Mr. Patterson before he became disabled, and instead applying a broader national economy standard, which was not contained in the policy, it had acted arbitrarily and capriciously.
Furthermore, the Court was disturbed with Aetna’s inconsistent handling of Mr. Patterson’s long-term disability claim. Specifically, that:
After conducting its first and only independent medical examination conducted in April 2009, and undertaking surveillance, Aetna continued to find that plaintiff was disabled. Its own records say so: Patterson “cannot work” and the medical information “continues to support [Patterson’s] disability.” Yet the doctor who performed the IME in 2009, like the doctor who undertook the review of medical records in 2014, both found that Patterson was capable of “sedentary work.” AR 00180, 00823. So what changed in those five years…? Why was Patterson “disabled” in 2009 but not disabled in 2014 based on very similar evidence?
Following its review of the record the Court determined that Aetna’s termination of benefits was “unlawful, and as such, “benefits should be reinstated to restore the status quo.” The Court also allowed Mr. Patterson to submit an application for attorney fees pursuant to ERISA.
This case was not handled by our law firm, but it is instructive for any disability policy holder that has been denied benefits. For a Free Consultation, please contact Attorneys Dell & Schaefer.
Resources to Help You Win Disability Benefits
Submit a Strong Appeal Package
We work with you, your doctors, and other experts to submit a very strong appeal.
Sue Your Disability Insurance Company
We have filed thousands of disability denial lawsuits in federal Courts nationwide.
Get Your Disability Application Approved
Prevent a Disability Benefit Denial
Negotiate a Lump-Sum Settlement
Our goal is to negotiate the highest possible buyout of your long-term disability policy.
Policy Holder Rating
Aetna STD has been a nightmare since the beginning
Reply
Aetna leaves me at risk of losing my job and without compension
Aetna puts their clients through hell with their games
Reply
It's been over 3 months, and I've only received one payment from Aetna
Reply
Aetna people are thieves, crooks and liars.
Aetna is definitely committing a crime and they need to be stopped.
Reply
I hate Aetna
Reply
Aetna denied me and then I got fired from my job
Reply
Q: Can Aetna deny my application on the basis of pre-exisiting condition? Do they discriminate against the mentally ill?
Q: Are there any circumstances in which I can appeal LTD after the number of days Aetna gives you to appeal?
Q: Can Aetna deny my claim due to a "war exclusion" on my policy?
Q: What do I do if Aetna claims they haven't received my medical info?
Q: How can Aetna say I am not disabled when clearly I am?
Q: Is the 2nd appeal process worth it or a waste of my time?
Q: What can I do to stop Aetna from harassing me and realize that not all disabilities are the same?
Q: Can Aetna deny my claim for STD due to pregnancy because it was preexisting?
Does Social Security Approval Mean Disability Insurance Benefits Will Be Paid?
Does a disability insurance company need to consider the side effects of my medications?
Does the Mental Nervous Disorder Limitation in an ERISA Long Term Disability Plan Violate ADA Laws?
Is it legal to limit disability insurance benefits to 24 months for mental nervous claims?
Why Must Your Disability Insurance Lawyer Understand Your Disabling Condition?
Disability Benefit Denial Reason #5 – Your Medical Evidence is Weak
Disability Benefit Denial Reason #4 - Your Doctor Is Misled By the Disability Company
Disability Benefit Denial Reason #3 - Video & Social Media Surveillance
Aetna Overturns Denial of Long Term Disability Benefits for Quality Control Manager
Aetna Removes 24 Month Limitation for Mental Health Conditions
Aetna Overturns Denial of LTD for Former Employee of The Home Depot
Aetna Reinstates Benefits for Former SAP America Employee Suffering the Effects of a Head Injury
Aetna overturned previous denial of long term disability benefits for Georgia Assistant
Dell Disability Lawyers file Lawsuit in Federal Court against Aetna after it denied long-term disability benefits to former software Developer
After Aetna denied Ms. Garner's long-term disability claim, Ms. Garner filed suit against Aetna, and the Court overturned Aetna's decision and ordered it to pay Ms. Garner's disability benefits
Aetna Reinstates Disability Insurance Benefits to Home Depot Manager
Reviews from Our Clients






