AETNA ordered by West Virginia Federal Judge to reevaluate denial of disability benefits to Bristol-Myers Squibb Manager
Routinely, disability insurance companies in their bid to reduce the amount of disability benefits to be awarded to disability benefits claimants will require the claimants to first apply for Social Security Disability benefits. If the claimant happened to be successful in his or her claim for Social Security Disability benefits, the insurance companies will then offset the amount of disability benefits awarded by the amount of disability benefits that the claimant received from the Social Security Administration (SSA). However, when it comes to losing out due to an SSA determination of the definition of “disability”, insurance companies will try their best to disregard the SSA determination as it is unfavorable for them financially to follow the SSA determination.
The case of Ricky A. Dickens v. AETNA Life Insurance Company is a very good example of how the AETNA Life Insurance Company (AETNA Life) in terminating the long term benefits of Mr. Dickens, tries to brush aside the fact that the SSA still considered the plaintiff a disabled person during the period in question.
The Facts of the Case
The plaintiff R.A Dickens was a senior territory business manager for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMS). The scope of the plaintiff’s occupation involved traveling and marketing drugs to doctors and the medical establishments. When hired by BMS in 2002, the plaintiff participated in a long term disability (LTD) plan offered by BMS and administered by AETNA Life. In early 2004, the plaintiff suffered clinical depression, anxiety, insomnia and suicidal ideations. Due to his disabling medical conditions, the plaintiff applied and received LTD benefits under the plan in 2004. The plaintiff was considered disabled under the LTD plan’s definition and received benefits until August 2008. In August 2008, AETNA Life terminated the LTD benefits of the plaintiff on the ground that the medical evidence demonstrated that the plaintiff was “…no longer suffering from a debilitating injury or illness.”
The plaintiff appealed several times but to no avail. One of the arguments put forward by the plaintiff was that the SSA continued to regard the plaintiff as being disabled under the relevant laws. The plaintiff argued that the definition of disability used by the SSA for determining whether a person is considered disabled or not is similar to the corresponding definition used under the LTD plan. As such, the plaintiff contested that AETNA Life had to give significant weight to the SSA’s disability determination while making its own determination of what is defined as disabled under the LTD plan.
AETNA Life’s reply to the plaintiff upholding the denial of LTD benefits stated that:
We also reviewed documentation from the Social Security Administration dated 9/20/04, which advised of your monthly disability benefit, and correspondence dated 6/11/07, which indicated continuation of those benefits. However, in order to be eligible for continued benefits under your LTD plan, we must conclude that you were unable to perform the essential functions of any job for which you are reasonable qualified because of your education, training or experience, effective 9/1/08.
The plaintiff’s disability lawyer filed a lawsuit against Aetna.
The District Court Ruling
Before making its ruling, the district court had to first decide if the SSA definition and LTD definition of “disabled” was similar. It does this by looking at three elements of the definition:
- The Causal component
- The Impairment component and
- The Scope component
It found that the two definitions were similar and in fact that the SSA definition was more resistive as it was more difficult to prove disability under the SSA definition. As such, it ruled that the SSA determination of disability in this case carries substantial weight. Thus, in order for AETNA Life “to observe principled and fair procedures, AETNA had to first consider the SSA’s disability award to the plaintiff before it can decide on its own disability determination.
The court ruled that Aetna’s action of providing “lip service” and mere acknowledgement of the Plaintiff’s SSA award does not constitute giving any weight to the SSA determination of disability at all. AETNA Life’s “cursory treatment of the SSA decision” only indicated it going through the motions rather than actually considering the evidence that it has before it. As such, the court ruled that AETNA Life’s decision to terminate the plaintiff’s disability benefits was an abuse of its discretion and therefore remanded the case back to AETNA Life requiring it to consider the relevant information which it had disregarded in making its disability determination the first place.
The court has given Aetna another chance to approve or deny disability benefits rather than exercise the discretion to award benefits.
Resources to Help You Win Disability Benefits
Submit a Strong Appeal Package
We work with you, your doctors, and other experts to submit a very strong appeal.
Sue Your Disability Insurance Company
We have filed thousands of disability denial lawsuits in federal Courts nationwide.
Get Your Disability Application Approved
Prevent a Disability Benefit Denial
Negotiate a Lump-Sum Settlement
Our goal is to negotiate the highest possible buyout of your long-term disability policy.
Policy Holder Rating
Aetna STD has been a nightmare since the beginning
Reply
Aetna leaves me at risk of losing my job and without compension
Aetna puts their clients through hell with their games
Reply
It's been over 3 months, and I've only received one payment from Aetna
Reply
Aetna people are thieves, crooks and liars.
Aetna is definitely committing a crime and they need to be stopped.
Reply
I hate Aetna
Reply
Aetna denied me and then I got fired from my job
Reply
Q: Can Aetna deny my application on the basis of pre-exisiting condition? Do they discriminate against the mentally ill?
Q: Are there any circumstances in which I can appeal LTD after the number of days Aetna gives you to appeal?
Q: Can Aetna deny my claim due to a "war exclusion" on my policy?
Q: What do I do if Aetna claims they haven't received my medical info?
Q: How can Aetna say I am not disabled when clearly I am?
Q: Is the 2nd appeal process worth it or a waste of my time?
Q: What can I do to stop Aetna from harassing me and realize that not all disabilities are the same?
Q: Can Aetna deny my claim for STD due to pregnancy because it was preexisting?
Does Social Security Approval Mean Disability Insurance Benefits Will Be Paid?
Does a disability insurance company need to consider the side effects of my medications?
Does the Mental Nervous Disorder Limitation in an ERISA Long Term Disability Plan Violate ADA Laws?
Is it legal to limit disability insurance benefits to 24 months for mental nervous claims?
Why Must Your Disability Insurance Lawyer Understand Your Disabling Condition?
Disability Benefit Denial Reason #5 – Your Medical Evidence is Weak
Disability Benefit Denial Reason #4 - Your Doctor Is Misled By the Disability Company
Disability Benefit Denial Reason #3 - Video & Social Media Surveillance
Aetna Overturns Denial of Long Term Disability Benefits for Quality Control Manager
Aetna Removes 24 Month Limitation for Mental Health Conditions
Aetna Overturns Denial of LTD for Former Employee of The Home Depot
Aetna Reinstates Benefits for Former SAP America Employee Suffering the Effects of a Head Injury
Aetna overturned previous denial of long term disability benefits for Georgia Assistant
Dell Disability Lawyers file Lawsuit in Federal Court against Aetna after it denied long-term disability benefits to former software Developer
After Aetna denied Ms. Garner's long-term disability claim, Ms. Garner filed suit against Aetna, and the Court overturned Aetna's decision and ordered it to pay Ms. Garner's disability benefits
Aetna Reinstates Disability Insurance Benefits to Home Depot Manager
Reviews from Our Clients






